Tariff War: Does Trump Actually Know What He’s Doing?

In partnership with

This tech company grew 32,481%...

No, it's not Nvidia... It's Mode Mobile, 2023’s fastest-growing software company according to Deloitte.

Just as Uber turned vehicles into income-generating assets, Mode is turning smartphones into an easy passive income source, already helping 45M+ users earn $325M+ through simple, everyday use.

They’ve just been granted their stock ticker by the Nasdaq, and you can still invest in their pre-IPO offering at just $0.26/share.

Invest Now

*Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.
*The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.
*Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.modemobile.com.

The ongoing tariff war initiated by former President Donald Trump has left many wondering whether his economic strategy was carefully calculated or merely reactionary chaos. The frequent imposition, retraction, and re-imposition of tariffs created an unpredictable environment that impacted global trade, especially affecting relationships with Canada, Mexico, and China.

A Pattern of Uncertainty

Trump’s approach to tariffs was marked by constant back-and-forth decisions. One moment, tariffs on Canada and Mexico were confirmed, then paused, then replaced by new tariffs, only to return to the original tariffs. This cycle repeated multiple times, creating significant confusion in global markets.

Even his own administration seemed caught off guard. For instance, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross confidently stated there would be no pauses in tariffs, only for Trump to reverse course two days later. Such unpredictability not only undermined the credibility of his policies but also left businesses struggling to make long-term investment decisions.

The Economic Rationale—Or Lack Thereof

Trump’s justifications for tariffs shifted constantly. At times, he framed them as a response to national security concerns, particularly citing the influx of fentanyl from Canada and Mexico. At other times, he argued tariffs were meant to protect American manufacturing and reduce reliance on foreign imports. Yet, when faced with the economic reality of increasing costs for U.S. consumers and manufacturers, he would abruptly modify his stance.

Take the auto industry as a prime example. The U.S., Canadian, and Mexican automobile sectors are deeply integrated, with parts crossing borders multiple times during the production process. A 25% tariff on vehicles would have significantly increased costs for both manufacturers and consumers, a fact that was well understood by economists and industry experts. Still, Trump proceeded with the tariffs—until he realized their devastating impact and abruptly pulled back.

Madman Theory or Incoherence?

Two competing theories attempt to explain Trump’s tariff policies:

1. The Chaos is Intentional – Some argue that Trump’s erratic behavior is a negotiation strategy, a deliberate attempt to keep adversaries off balance. This is sometimes referred to as the "madman theory," where unpredictability forces opponents to make concessions out of fear of what he might do next.

2. The Chaos is Just Chaos – Others believe that Trump’s economic policies lack coherence. His frequent reversals, inconsistent justifications, and failure to anticipate the consequences suggest he was acting impulsively, rather than executing a master plan.

The Real Impact

Regardless of intent, Trump’s tariff policies had tangible economic effects. The uncertainty caused by his flip-flopping made it difficult for companies to plan investments, disrupted supply chains, and caused stock market volatility. While Trump often claimed credit for stock market gains, he downplayed the declines that coincided with his tariff threats.

Additionally, America’s trading partners began seeking alternatives. Canada, for example, initially withdrew its retaliatory tariffs when Trump first paused his tariffs. But as Trump continued to play the tariff game, Canada signaled a more permanent shift away from economic reliance on the U.S. In the long run, such actions may have weakened America’s leverage rather than strengthened it.

Final Thoughts

Trump’s tariff war was, at best, a high-stakes gamble and, at worst, an incoherent economic strategy that damaged international relations and business confidence. While his rhetoric about bringing manufacturing back to America resonated with many, the reality was that tariffs alone could not easily undo decades of globalization.

What do you think—was Trump’s tariff strategy a calculated move or simply erratic decision-making? Let us know your thoughts.