Sunk Cost Fallacy: Why We Throw Good Money After Bad

In partnership with

From Wall Street to Your Portfolio: Master Value Investing

The Applied Value Investing Certificate Program from Wharton Online and Wall Street Prep is an 8-week, online, self-paced program that teaches participants how to identify undervalued stocks with the process-driven approach used by the world’s top investors.

Program benefits also include:

• Guest Speaker Series with top industry professionals

• Exclusive access to networking and recruitment events

• Invitation-Only LinkedIn Groups and Slack Channels

• Certificate issued by Wharton Online and Wall Street Prep

Learn More

You’ve already paid for an expensive gym membership, but you hate going. Do you keep forcing yourself to go just to “get your money’s worth?” Welcome to the sunk cost fallacy.

Sunk costs are irreversible past expenses, and the sunk cost fallacy is the tendency to continue investing in something just because you’ve already invested in it—even when it no longer makes sense. Whether it’s holding onto a losing stock or finishing a bad movie, this fallacy distorts our decision-making and can have costly consequences.

What is the Sunk Cost Fallacy?

The sunk cost fallacy occurs when people make decisions based on previously invested resources (money, time, or effort) rather than the current and future value of those decisions. It’s a bias that makes us irrationally committed to past choices, even when they no longer serve our best interests.

For example:

• You’ve spent ₹1 lakh renovating a house, but further repairs will cost more than the house is worth. Instead of cutting losses, you persist to avoid “wasting” your initial investment.

• You keep holding a stock that’s declining in value because you’ve already invested heavily in it.

The term “sunk cost” comes from economics, referring to costs that have already been incurred and cannot be recovered. Rational decision-making requires ignoring sunk costs and focusing on future value—a principle easier said than done.

Examples of the Sunk Cost Fallacy in Finance

1. Investing: Investors often hold onto poorly performing stocks or mutual funds because they’ve already spent money on them. This behavior leads to missed opportunities to reallocate capital to better investments.

2. Real Estate: Homeowners may continue pouring money into renovations or repairs even when the property’s market value doesn’t justify the expense.

3. Business: Companies often stick with failing projects or products due to the resources already spent, rather than cutting losses and moving on.

4. Personal Life: Individuals frequently attend events, finish bad books, or persist with hobbies they no longer enjoy because they’ve already paid for them.

The Psychology Behind the Sunk Cost Fallacy

Why do we fall for this bias? The sunk cost fallacy stems from several psychological tendencies:

• Loss Aversion: We fear losing what we’ve already invested, even if continuing results in greater losses.

• Cognitive Dissonance: To avoid feeling regret or admitting a mistake, we rationalize continuing our initial choice.

• Commitment and Consistency: Once we’ve committed to a decision, we feel pressure to remain consistent with it.

These tendencies are deeply ingrained, making the sunk cost fallacy a hard habit to break.

Impacts of the Sunk Cost Fallacy

1. Financial Losses: Persisting with bad investments or projects drains resources that could be better allocated elsewhere.

2. Opportunity Cost: By focusing on sunk costs, we miss opportunities to invest time, money, or effort in more rewarding ventures.

3. Emotional Stress: The fallacy often leads to frustration, regret, and a sense of being trapped in poor decisions.

How to Avoid the Sunk Cost Fallacy

1. Focus on Future Value: Evaluate decisions based on their potential benefits, not past expenses. Ask yourself, “If I hadn’t already invested in this, would I still choose it today?”

2. Set Clear Exit Strategies: Establish limits on time, money, or effort before committing to a project. For example, decide in advance how much you’re willing to invest in a stock before selling.

3. Separate Emotions from Logic: Recognize when emotional attachment is clouding your judgment. Use data and objective analysis to guide decisions.

4. Ask the Right Questions: Shift your perspective by focusing on the future. Would continuing this investment improve your financial or personal situation?

Practical Applications in Daily Life

1. Investments: Regularly reassess your portfolio. If a stock is underperforming, consider selling it and reallocating funds to better opportunities.

2. Time Management: Let go of unproductive tasks or hobbies that don’t align with your current goals, even if you’ve invested significant time in them.

3. Shopping and Subscriptions: Avoid keeping unused subscriptions or memberships just because you’ve already paid for them. Focus on whether they add value to your life today.

4. Business Decisions: Use metrics and performance indicators to evaluate projects. Don’t hesitate to abandon initiatives that no longer make sense, regardless of past investments.

Conclusion

The sunk cost fallacy is a trap that leads to poor financial decisions and wasted resources. While it’s natural to feel attached to past investments, it’s crucial to remember that those costs are gone. What matters is the future value of your choices.

By learning to let go and focusing on what lies ahead, you can make smarter financial decisions, reduce stress, and achieve your goals more effectively. Remember: sometimes, the best choice is to cut your losses and move on.